Later v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 633 A.2d 743 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Later v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 633 A.2d 743 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chester J. Later
v.
Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Cromwell
12152.
Connecticut Appellate Court.
Nov 23, 1993.
633 A.2d 743
William O. RiisJca, with whom, on the brief, was Gregory T. D'Auria, for the appellants (plaintiffs)., Richard W. Tomc, with whom, on the brief, was John H. Hanks, for the appellees (defendants).
Published
Per Curiam.

Although the briefs submitted by the parties raise multiple legal issues, the dispositive threshold question is whether there exists any material issue of fact that would have precluded the trial court from granting summary judgment for the defendant.

We conclude that no such material issue of fact was presented by the plaintiffs’ affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment and that the granting of the summary judgment was proper.

The judgment is affirmed.