Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Essex Yacht Sales, Inc., 495 A.2d 281 (Conn. 1985). · Go Syfert
Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Essex Yacht Sales, Inc., 495 A.2d 281 (Conn. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the trial court may not seek beyond the complaint for facts not alleged, or necessarily implied. . . .”
66 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: The Bank of New Haven v. Chrysler Finan., No. Cv-98-0409845 S (Oct. 1, 1998) (connsuperct, 1998-10-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) The Bank of New Haven v. Chrysler Finan., No. Cv-98-0409845 S (Oct. 1, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the trial court may not seek beyond the complaint for facts not alleged, or necessarily implied. . . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Silva v. New York Life Insurance Co., No. Cv97 034 29 73 S (Jan. 12, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
(See Complaint, p. 8.) "Conclusory statements or statements of legal effect not supported by allegations of fact will not enable a complaint to withstand a motion to strike." Mazza v. Connecticut Light and Power , Superior Court, judicial district of Waterbury at Waterbury, Docket No. 130546 (March 9, 2000, Hodgson, J. ); see also Fortini v. New England Log Homes, Inc. , 4 Conn. App. 132 , 134-35 , 492 A.2d 545 , cert. dismissed, 197 Conn. 801 , 495 A.2d 280 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fetzer v. Rywolt, No. Cv94 031 09 56 S (Apr. 3, 1995)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Fortini v. New England Log Homes, CT Page 4360 Inc., 4 Conn. App. 132 , 135 , 492 A.2d 545 , cert. dismissed, 197 Conn. 801 , 495 A.2d 280 (1985) (affirming trial court's motion to strike a count brought by a sole shareholder for interfering with the corporation's business.) The case that the Fetzers city, Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc., supra, 178 Conn. 282 , demonstrates the error in their argument.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartford National Bank and Trust Company
v.
Essex Yacht Sales, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 10, 1985.
495 A.2d 281
Lawrence M. Lapine, in support of the petition., Patricia B. Perkins, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The petition of the intervening defendant, First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 4 Conn. App. 58, is dismissed.