green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Culver v. Culver
See Albrecht v. Albrecht, 19 Conn. App. 146, 151 , 562 A.2d 528 (“[djecrees in a dissolution action cannot be modified by acts of the parties without further decree or order by the court”), cert, denied, 212 Conn. 813 , 565 A.2d 534 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Danehy v. Danehy
“A term not expressly included will not be read into a contract unless it arises by necessary implication from the provisions of the instrument.” Texaco, Inc. v. Rogow, 150 Conn. 401, 408 , 190 A.2d 48 (1963); see Albrecht v. Albrecht, 19 Conn. App. 146, 151-53 , 562 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 813 , 565 A.2d 534 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. Young
See, e.g., Albrecht v. Albrecht, 19 Conn. App. 146, 151 , 562 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 813 , 565 A.2d 534 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TANZMAN v. Meurer
Our Supreme Court has stated that earning capacity is not an amount which a person can theoretically earn, nor is it confined to actual income, but rather it is an amount *413 which a person can realistically be expected to earn considering such things as his vocational skills, employ-ability, age and health.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]), rev’d on other grounds, 280 Conn. 764 , 911 A.2d 1077 , after remand, 104 Conn. App. 482 , 934 A.2d 306 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 911 , 943 A.2d 472 (2008); see also Hart v. Hart, 19 Conn. App. 91, 95 , 561 A.2d 151 (“[i]t is particularly…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard L. Albrecht
v.
Katherine Albrecht
v.
Katherine Albrecht
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 1989.
Richard G. Kent, in support of the petition., Thomas M. Shanley, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 146, is denied.