green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Machado
See McCarthy v. Bridgeport, 21 Conn. App. 359 , 361 n.l, 574 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 814 , 576 A.2d 543 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Planning & Zoning Commission
See Krawski v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 21 Conn. App. 667, 670 , 575 A.2d 1036 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 814 , 576 A.2d 543 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garrison v. Planning Board of Stamford
See Krawski v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 21 Conn. App. 667, 670-71 , 575 A.2d 1036 (upholding denial of subdivision application on ground of applicable existing zoning violation incorporated by reference in subdivision regulations), cert. denied, 215 Conn. 814 , 576 A.2d 543 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. PLANNING AND ZONING COM'N OF TOWN OF WINDSOR
See Purtill v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission, supra, 146 Conn. 571 -72; see also Krawski v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 21 Conn. App. 667 , *737 670, 575 A.2d 1036 (“coordination between the [planning and zoning] functions is desirable and beneficial to the municipality”), cert. denied, 215 Conn. 814 , 576 A.2d 543 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bergren v. Pzc, Town of Berlin, No. Cv 00 0502879s (Jul. 6, 2001)
See also then Judge Borden's remarks in dissent in Krawski v. Planning Zoning Commission , 21 Conn. App. 667 , 678 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 814 (1990): This section [similar to § 30.01] does no more than set forth a permissive procedure under which a subdivision applicant may obtain an informal review prior to the submission of a formal application.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrison v. Planning Board of Stamford, No. Cv 99-0172754 S (Apr. 26, 2000)
General Statutes § 8-26 provides in relevant part "nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the commission to approve any such subdivision or resubdivision which conflicts with applicable zoning regulations." Pursuant to General Statutes 8-26 , "statutory requirements must be read to concern zoning violations inherent in the plan itself as submitted and not potential use violations." Federico v. Planning Zoning Commission, 5 Conn. App. 509 , 515 , 500 A.2d 576 (1985); see also Krawski v. Planning Zoning Commission, 21 Conn. App. 667 , 673 , 575 A.2d 1036 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dianne De Martino
v.
Parkview West Associates
v.
Parkview West Associates
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 14, 1990.
Ira S. Grudberg and Alice S. Miskimin, in support of the petition., James S. Connolly, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 826, is denied.