State v. Graham, 577 A.2d 1063 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Graham, 577 A.2d 1063 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Cruz (connappct, 2002-07-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cruz (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Graham, 21 Conn. App. 688, 716 , 575 A.2d 1057 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 805 , 577 A.2d 1063 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Fernandez (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
"While no precise theorem can be laid down, we have held that it is proper for a trial court to ... [intervene] where the witness is embarrassed, has a language problem or may not understand a question." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Iban C. , 275 Conn. 624 , 652, 881 A.2d 1005 (2005) ; see also State v. Graham , 21 Conn.App. 688 , 692-93, 575 A.2d 1057 ("[a] trial court has a discretionary right to intervene in the examination of witnesses where such intervention is necessary to clarify confusing testimony, restrain an obstreperous witness, or elucidate a witness' understanding…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Thomas Graham
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 24, 1990.
577 A.2d 1063
Linda J. Morkan and Leny K. Wallen-Friedman, in support of the petition., Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 688, is denied.