State v. Graham, 577 A.2d 1063 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Graham, 577 A.2d 1063 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Cruz (connappct, 2002-07-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cruz (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Graham, 21 Conn. App. 688, 716 , 575 A.2d 1057 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 805 , 577 A.2d 1063 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Fernandez (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
"While no precise theorem can be laid down, we have held that it is proper for a trial court to ... [intervene] where the witness is embarrassed, has a language problem or may not understand a question." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Iban C. , 275 Conn. 624 , 652, 881 A.2d 1005 (2005) ; see also State v. Graham , 21 Conn.App. 688 , 692-93, 575 A.2d 1057 ("[a] trial court has a discretionary right to intervene in the examination of witnesses where such intervention is necessary to clarify confusing testimony, restrain an obstreperous witness, or elucidate a witness' understanding…
State of Connecticut
v.
Thomas Graham
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 24, 1990.
577 A.2d 1063
Linda J. Morkan and Leny K. Wallen-Friedman, in support of the petition., Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 688, is denied.