Expressway Assocs. II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 580 A.2d 56 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Expressway Assocs. II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 580 A.2d 56 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCoy v. Commissioner of Public Safety (conn, 2011-01-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" McCoy v. Commissioner of Public Safety (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Brown, 22 Conn.App. 108, 111 , 575 A.2d 699 (citing Kluttz ), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990); State v. Trahan, 45 Conn.App. 722, 733 , 697 A.2d 1153 (citing portion of Brown that had cited Kluttz ), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 924 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
cited Cited "see" State v. Trahan
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 111 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Harrison
Conn. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., id., 202 (motor vehicle violation is a crime for purposes of qualifying for drug treatment program); State v. Dukes, 209 Conn. 98, 122 , 547 A.2d 10 (1988) (motor vehicle violation is a crime for purposes of a reasonable search of occupant of stopped vehicle); see also State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 112 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990) (motor vehicle violation is a violation of criminal laws for purposes of determining whether condition of probation has been violated); State v. Kluttz, 9 Conn. App. 686, 698-700 , 521 A.2d 178 (1987) (negligent ho…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Expressway Associates II
v.
Friendly Ice Cream Corporation of Connecticut
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 1990.
580 A.2d 56
William H. Champlin III, in support of the petition., Stephen Sakonchick II and James T. Shearin, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 124, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in including further proceedings with respect to damages in the remand when the plaintiff failed to prove damages at trial and conceded that it was entitled only to nominal damages?”