State v. Bowens, 593 A.2d 971 (Conn. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Bowens, 593 A.2d 971 (Conn. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Purvis (connappct, 2024-08-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Purvis (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659 , 676–77, 828 A.2d 659 (acknowledging that ‘‘[t]he quantity of drugs is not . . . the sole dispositive factor’’ because intent can be inferred through circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 248, 253, 61 A.3d 1084 (2013). ‘‘Moreover, [a] large num- ber of packets in the defendant’s possession is [a] fact from which the inference of possession with intent to sell can be drawn.’’ State v. Bowens, 24 Conn. App. 642, 649 , 591 A.2…
discussed Cited "see" R. Zemper & Associates v. Scozzafava
Conn. App. Ct. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
Beazley Co. v. Streeto, 20 Conn. App. 718 , 570 A.2d 233 (1990), and Steiner v. Bran Park Associates, 216 Conn. 419, 423, 428 , 582 A.2d 173 (1990), concerning the requirement that a broker prove the buyer’s financial ability to make the purchase to be entitled to judgment.” 1 “ ‘To recover a commission, a broker must ordinarily show . . . that he has produced a customer ready, willing and able to buy on terms acceptable to the seller . . . .’ (Citations omitted.) Howland v. Schweir, 7 Conn. App. 709, 713 , 510 A.2d 215 (1986); see McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. Berman, 218 Conn. 512, 51…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Allen Bowens
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 25, 1991.
593 A.2d 971
Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 642, is denied.