State v. Washington, 614 A.2d 829 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Washington, 614 A.2d 829 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Righi v. Righi (connappct, 2017-04-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Righi v. Righi
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-Away, Bridgeport, Inc. , 28 Conn.App. 460 , 464, 611 A.2d 435 (court's memorandum of decision contained "all of the necessary subordinate findings to support the conclusion that [the defendant] had anticipatorily breached the contract as claimed at trial by [another defendant], even though it did not, in fact, use the talismanic words 'anticipatory breach' "), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992) ; Nielsen v. Wisniewski , 32 Conn.App. 133 , 139, 628 A.2d 25 (1993) (a finding of "wrongful conduct" was sufficient to affirm an award of…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 28 Conn. App. 474, 481 , 612 A.2d 123 (taking particular note that defense counsel did not view court’s conduct to be so prejudicial as to warrant objection or motion for new trial), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Gojcaj
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Washington, 28 Conn. App. 369 , 372– 73, 610 A.2d 1332 (consciousness of guilt instruction merely stating permissive inference not constitutional in nature and must be properly objected to at trial), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 829 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Robertson
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 28 Conn. App. 474, 479-81 , 612 A.2d 123 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992) (no error where trial court rephrased state’s questions after witness failed to answer appropriately).
discussed Cited "see" Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. Partnership
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it away, Bridgeport, Inc., 28 Conn. App. 460 , 611 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992); see also Sagamore Corp. v. Willcutt, 120 Conn. 315 , 180 A. 464 (1935).
discussed Cited "see" Nielsen v. Wisniewski
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullman, Com- ley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-away, Bridgeport, Inc., 28 Conn. App. 460, 464 , 611 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992) (use of talismanic words is not required where memorandum of decision contains all necessary subordinate findings to support trial court’s conclusion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Maurice Washington
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
614 A.2d 829
Alfred J. Onorato, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 369, is denied.