green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brunetti
Ed. 2d 147 (1989); United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1082 (9th Cir. 1989); United States v. Boukater, 409 F.2d 537, 538-39 (5th Cir. 1969); see also State v. Fields, 31 Conn. App. 312, 325 , 624 A.2d 1165 (“a consent to search does not have to be in writing to be valid”), cert. denied, 226 Conn. 916 , 628 A.2d 989 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brunetti
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Price, 54 F.3d 342, 346-47 (7th Cir.1995); United States v. Thompson, 876 F.2d 1381, 1384 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 868 , 110 S.Ct. 192 , 107 L.Ed.2d 147 (1989); United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1082 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Boukater, 409 F.2d 537, 538-39 (5th Cir.1969); see also State v. Fields, 31 Conn.App. 312, 325 , 624 A.2d 1165 ("a consent to search does not have to be in writing to be valid"), cert. denied, 226 Conn. 916 , 628 A.2d 989 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sparks
Ed. 2d 1247 (1968); State v. Anderson, 178 Conn. 287, 291 , 422 A.2d 323 (1979); see also State v. Fields, 31 Conn. App. 312, 320 , 624 A.2d 1165 , cert. denied, 226 Conn. 916 , 628 A.2d 989 (1993).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Carswell, 36 Conn. App. 336, 340-41 , 650 A.2d 924 (1994), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 908 , 653 A.2d 195 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carswell
Ed. 2d 1247 (1968); State v. Anderson, 178 Conn. 287, 291 , 422 A.2d 323 (1979); see also State v. Fields, 31 Conn. App. 312, 320 , 624 A.2d 1165 , cert. denied, 226 Conn. 916 , 628 A.2d 989 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Espirito Santo Bank of Florida
v.
David T. Chase
v.
David T. Chase
SC 14803.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 8, 1993.
Richard P. Weinstein, in support of the petition., David P. Condon, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 12139) is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal on the ground of: (1) lack of a final judgment; or (2) mootness?”