Bd. of Educ. of Town of Wallingford v. Local 1282, Dist. 1, Commc'ns Workers of Am., 632 A.2d 688 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Bd. of Educ. of Town of Wallingford v. Local 1282, Dist. 1, Commc'ns Workers of Am., 632 A.2d 688 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mosby v. Board of Education (connappct, 2019-07-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mosby v. Board of Education
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Board of Education v. Local 1282, 31 Conn. App. 629, 632 , 626 A.2d 1314 (‘‘[t]he designation of a particular officer or officers on whom service may be made excludes all others.’’), cert. granted, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993) (appeal withdrawn January 3, 1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Board of Education of the Town of Wallingford
v.
Local 1282, District 1, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
SC 14835.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 1993.
632 A.2d 688
Lawrence J. Campane, in support of the petition., Anne Goldstein, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 629 (AC 11160), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the provisions for service of process set forth in General Statutes § 52-57 (e) are mandatory rather than permissive?

“2. Should the Appellate Court have considered the defendant’s argument, raised for the first time in its reply brief, that service of process was not required to confer jurisdiction on the trial court to hear the plaintiff’s application to vacate?”

[*910] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14835. Decided September 15, 1993* Lawrence J. Campane, in support of the petition. Anne Goldstein, in opposition.