green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.3 score
“t was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that the coins would be stored either among the defendant's collections at his residence or among the items for sale at his business, and, accordingly, probable cause existed to search both places”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Paradis, No. Cr01 197032 (Oct. 18, 2002)
t was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that the coins would be stored either among the defendant's collections at his residence or among the items for sale at his business, and, accordingly, probable cause existed to search both places
cited
Cited "see"
CTB Ventures 55, Inc. v. Rubenstein
See State v. Zollo, 36 Conn. App. 718, 726 , 654 A.2d 359 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 906 , 660 A.2d 859 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murray v. Santa Fuel, Inc., No. Cv97 034 26 01 (Apr. 1, 1999)
See also Emerick v. Kuhn, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford/New Britain at New Britain, Docket No. 460869 (May 7, 1996, Handy, J.), cert. denied, 234 Conn. 906 , 659 A.2d 1208 (1995) (question of fact for jury to decide whether, given plaintiff's claimed work sacrifices, defendants benefit therefrom rises to level of unjust enrichment).
Roger Emerick
v.
Robert Kuhn
v.
Robert Kuhn
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 13, 1995.
Roger Emerick, pro se, in support of the petition., Felix J. Springer and Glenn W. Dowd, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14554) is denied.
Berdon, J.,dissenting. I would grant the petition for certification filed by the plaintiff.