Emerick v. Kuhn, 659 A.2d 1208 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Emerick v. Kuhn, 659 A.2d 1208 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“t was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that the coins would be stored either among the defendant's collections at his residence or among the items for sale at his business, and, accordingly, probable cause existed to search both places”
25 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Paradis, No. Cr01 197032 (Oct. 18, 2002) (connsuperct, 2002-10-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Paradis, No. Cr01 197032 (Oct. 18, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
t was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that the coins would be stored either among the defendant's collections at his residence or among the items for sale at his business, and, accordingly, probable cause existed to search both places
cited Cited "see" CTB Ventures 55, Inc. v. Rubenstein
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Zollo, 36 Conn. App. 718, 726 , 654 A.2d 359 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 906 , 660 A.2d 859 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Murray v. Santa Fuel, Inc., No. Cv97 034 26 01 (Apr. 1, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Emerick v. Kuhn, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford/New Britain at New Britain, Docket No. 460869 (May 7, 1996, Handy, J.), cert. denied, 234 Conn. 906 , 659 A.2d 1208 (1995) (question of fact for jury to decide whether, given plaintiff's claimed work sacrifices, defendants benefit therefrom rises to level of unjust enrichment).
Roger Emerick
v.
Robert Kuhn
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 13, 1995.
659 A.2d 1208
Roger Emerick, pro se, in support of the petition., Felix J. Springer and Glenn W. Dowd, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14554) is denied.

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the petition for certification filed by the plaintiff.