Lemoine v. McCann, 674 A.2d 1330 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Lemoine v. McCann, 674 A.2d 1330 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“defendant must have had the intent to aid the principal and in so doing must have intended to commit the offense with which he is charged”
28 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Floyd (conn, 2000-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Floyd
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
defendant must have had the intent to aid the principal and in so doing must have intended to commit the offense with which he is charged
cited Cited "see" State v. Henry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Malone, 40 Conn. App. 470, 476-77 , 671 A.2d 1321 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 904 , 674 A.2d 1332 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carrubba v. Moskowitz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
In addition to the foregoing, ‘state officers and employees’ includes . . . attorneys appointed by the court as special assistant public defenders . . . .” Thus, § 4-141 on its face makes § 4-165 applicable to attorneys appointed by the court, but limits it to “attorneys appointed as victim compensation commissioners, attorneys appointed by the Public Defenders Services Commission as public defenders, assistant public defenders or deputy assistant public defenders, and attorneys appointed by the court as special assistant public defenders . . . .” General Statutes § 4-141; see als…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rodriguez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Atkins, 57 Conn. App. 248, 255 , 748 A.2d 343 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 916 , 754 A.2d 164 (2000); see also State v. Malone, 40 Conn. App. 470, 476-79 , 671 A.2d 1321 (discussing admission of prior inconsistent statements in light of criminal defendant’s right, under state, federal constitutions, to opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses), cert. denied, 237 Conn. 904 , 674 A.2d 1332 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KENNETH F. LEMOINE, JR.
v.
JAMES F. MCCANN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 22, 1996.
674 A.2d 1330
Kenneth F. Lemoine, Jr., pro se, in support of the petition.
Berdon.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

Lead Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 460 (AC 14741), is denied.

Dissent

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal.