green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Angrave v. Oates
See Polivy v. Air One, Inc., 46 Conn. App. 573, 575 , 700 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 937 , 702 A.2d 644 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Perry
See State v. Smith, 46 Conn. App. 600, 608 , 700 A.2d 91 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 935 , 702 A.2d 642 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jenkins
See State v. Wearing, 46 Conn. App. 741, 756 , 701 A.2d 41 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 937 , 702 A.2d 645 (1997) (factor to be considered in determining whether improper ruling on evidence harmless is whether testimony was cumulative).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rosario
In considering the evidence introduced in a case, [triers of fact] are not required to leave common *89 sense at the courtroom door . . . nor are they expected to lay aside matters of common knowledge or their own observations and experience of the affairs of life, but, on the contrary, to apply them to the facts in hand, to the end that their action may be intelligent and their conclusions correct.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hyde, 104 Conn. App. 574, 580 , 935 A.2d 639 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 910 , 940 A.2d 809 (2008); see also State v. Caprilozzi, 45 Conn. App. 4…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LINDA AYRES
v.
UNITED METHODIST HOME OF CONNECTICUT
v.
UNITED METHODIST HOME OF CONNECTICUT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 22, 1997.
Linda Ayres, pro se, in support of the petition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.