green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brody v. Brody
See Brown v. Villano, 49 Conn. App. 365 , 369–70, 716 A.2d 111 (new hearing required where trial court improperly applied preponderance standard, rather than clear and convincing standard), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 513 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mullien
See State v. Morris, 49 Conn. App. 409, 415 , 716 A.2d 897 (proper for court to permit amendment to amplify or correct time of commission of offense when it is not material element of crime charged), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 516 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. ANTWON W.
See State v. Morris, 49 Conn. App. 409, 419-20 , 716 A.2d 897 (concluding victim age requirements of § 53-21 and General Statutes § 53a-73a [a] [1] [A] [under fifteen years of age] require proof of different facts for purposes of Blockburger), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 516 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griswold Airport, Inc. v. Town of Madison
See Saybrook Point Marina Partnership v. Old Saybrook, 49 Conn. App. 106, 110-11 , 712 A.2d 980 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 515 (1998); Stratford Arms Co. v. Stratford, 7 Conn. App. 496, 500 , 508 A.2d 842 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. STEPHEN O.
See State v. Morris, 49 Conn. App. 409, 419 , 716 A.2d 897 (contrasting for Blockburger purposes proof of age required by § 53-21 with that required by § 53a-73a [a] [1] [A]), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 516 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wyatt
See State v. Morris, 49 Conn. App. 409, 418 , 716 A.2d 897 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 516 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Barnett
See State v. Morris, 49 Conn. App. 409, 420 , 716 A.2d 897 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 516 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Jessica S.
See Brown v. Villano, 49 Conn. App. 365, 372 , 716 A.2d 111 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 513 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lesnewski v. Redvers
General Statutes §§ 45a-242 (a) and 45a-199; see also Brown v. Villano, 49 Conn. App. 365, 373-74 , 716 A.2d 111 (remanding to Superior Court to apply Newman’s best *541 interests test to determine whether conserved person’s attorney may appeal Probate Court’s acceptance of accounting of conserved person’s estate), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 904 , 720 A.2d 513 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THOMAS F. BROWN
v.
WILLIAM VILLANO, COCONSERVATORS (ESTATE OF RUTH VILLANO)
v.
WILLIAM VILLANO, COCONSERVATORS (ESTATE OF RUTH VILLANO)
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 1998.
Thomas F. Brown, in support of the petition., Charles D. Ray, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 365 (AC 16199), is denied.