State v. Bostwick, 733 A.2d 235 (Conn. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Bostwick, 733 A.2d 235 (Conn. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Bardliving (connappct, 2008-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bardliving
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jenkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 52 Conn. App. 385, 401 , 726 A.2d 657 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 920 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999). *259 B The defendant also claims the prosecutor improperly appealed to the emotions, passions and prejudices of the jurors during closing argument.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sinvil
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
Although we are mindful of the balance that must be struck by a prosecutor in making his arguments to the jury; see State v. Williams, supra, 204 Conn. 538 ; in a case such as this, the prosecutor must be particularly circumspect in his speech and conduct to avoid introducing improper and irrelevant factors for the jury’s consideration; see Jenkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 52 Conn. App. 385, 401 , 726 A.2d 657 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 920 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999); on an issue where there was no evidence presented and where that deficiency could create reasonable doubt.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Yusuf (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jenkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 52 Conn. App. 385, 399-400 , 726 A.2d 657 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 920 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Stevenson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jenkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 52 Conn. App. 385, 401 , 726 A.2d 657 (use of pronoun “I” in argument increases chances arguments will deteriorate into expressions of personal opinion), cert. denied, 249 Conn. 920 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Davies v. General Tours, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jenkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 52 Conn. App. 385, 406 , 726 A.2d 657 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 920 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gibson (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although “[t]he mere use of phrases such as I would think, I would submit, and I really don’t think, does not transform a closing [argument] into the improper assertions of personal opinion by the [prosecutor]”; (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted) State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 421 , 931 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007); see also Jenkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 52 Conn. App. 385, 400 , 726 A.2d 657 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 920 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999); the prosecutor is not permitted to express an opinion as to the credibility of wi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
CHARLES BOSTWICK
SC 16127.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 16, 1999.
733 A.2d 235
Robert M. Berke, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 557 (AC 17927), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[*921] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16127. Robert M. Berke, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a violation of probation need not be wilful in order to justify a revocation of probation?”