green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boyd
(2×)
Second, the defendant contends that although the Appellate Court has decided that a definite sentence for purposes of § 53a-39 includes both the executed and suspended portions of a split sentence; see State v. Adam H., 54 Conn. App. 387, 392 , 735 A.2d 839 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 905 , 738 A.2d 1091 (1999); this court should distinguish special parole from the suspended portion of a prison sentence.
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
See Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 251 Conn. 904, 905 , 738 A.2d 1091 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ADAM H.
v.
ADAM H.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 29, 1999.
Glenn M. Conway, in support of the petition., Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 387 (AC 17912), is denied.
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.