green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
“it is fundamental to the concept of a corporation that its affairs are to be controlled by a board of directors elected by a majority of the stockholders . . .”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Office v. Iedi Group, Inc., No. Cv 01-0456900 (Sep. 16, 2002)
it is fundamental to the concept of a corporation that its affairs are to be controlled by a board of directors elected by a majority of the stockholders . . .
cited
Cited "see"
D'Amico v. Department of Correction
See Tartaglino v. Dept. of Correction, 55 Conn. App. 190, 195-96 , 737 A.2d 993 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 929 , 742 A.2d 364 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saunders v. Firtel
(2×)
See, e.g., Chance v. Norwalk Fast Oil, Inc., 55 Conn.App. 272, 279 , 739 A.2d 1275 (affirming dissolution of corporation when trial court "properly concluded that there is no more chance of breaking the deadlock between the parties in the future than there has been in the past"), cert. denied, 251 Conn. 929 , 742 A.2d 361 (1999); Krall v. Krall, 141 Conn. 325, 327, 334-36 , 106 A.2d 165 (1954) (upholding trial court's appointment of receiver for corporation in which parties owned 49 and 50 percent interests, when defendant conducted corporation as though he personally owned all outstanding sto…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Value Computer v. Advance Computing Sol., No. Cv99-0152255s (Apr. 18, 2000)
See General Statutes § 33-899 ; see also Chance v. Norwalk Fast Oil , 55 Conn. App. 272 , ___ A.2d ___, cert denied, 251 Conn. 929 , ___ A.2d ___ (1999) (affirming trial court's decree of dissolution pursuant to General Statutes §§ 33-896 (b) and 33-899 , after the taking of evidence including exhibits and briefs).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Brandon W.
Ed. 2d 308 (1997); see also Chance v. Norwalk Fast Oil, Inc., 55 Conn. App. 272, 276 , 739 A.2d 1275 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 929 , 742 A.2d 361 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALBERT CHANCE
v.
NORWALK FAST OIL, INC.
v.
NORWALK FAST OIL, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 30, 1999.
Christopher T. Coburn, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The petition by the defendants Seymour Epstein, Morris Epstein and Richard Kosminoff for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 272 (AC 18303), is denied.