green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Keller v. Beckenstein
Because a motion to strike challenges the legal sufficiency of a pleading and, consequently, requires no factual findings by the trial court, our review of the court’s ruling on the [defendant’s motion] is plenary. *563 . . . [W]e take the facts to be those alleged in the complaint that has been stricken and we construe the complaint in the manner most favorable to sustaining its legal sufficiency.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 137.
discussed
Cited "see"
Melfi v. City of Danbury
(2×)
See Bennett v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc., 56 Conn. App. 134, 136-37 , 741 A.2d 349 (1999) (conclusory statements absent supportive facts insufficient to survive motion to strike), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 938 , 747 A.2d 2 (2000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Michael R.
See, e.g., State v. Jackson, 56 Conn. App. 264, 277 , 742 A.2d 812 (defendant acted on more than one occasion), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 938 , 747 A.2d 4 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WILLIAM F. BENNETT
v.
CONNECTICUT HOSPICE, INC.
v.
CONNECTICUT HOSPICE, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2000.
William F. Bennett, pro se, in support of the petition., Jody Benbow, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 134 (AC 18765), is denied.
William F. Bennett, pro se, in support of the petition. Jody Benbow, in opposition. Decided March 2, 2000