Ancona v. Manafort Bros., 749 A.2d 1202 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Ancona v. Manafort Bros., 749 A.2d 1202 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the plaintiff's conclusory statements . . . are ct page 9195 insufficient to support a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.”
67 citation events (52 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nosik v. Bowman, No. Cv 00 0379089 (Jul. 12, 2002) (connsuperct, 2002-07-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Nosik v. Bowman, No. Cv 00 0379089 (Jul. 12, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the plaintiff's conclusory statements . . . are ct page 9195 insufficient to support a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
discussed Cited "see" Iadanza v. Toor (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bernet v. Bernet, 56 Conn. App. 661, 664 , 745 A.2d 827 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).’’ Cathedral Green, Inc. v. Hughes, supra, 610 n.2. 5 The defendant also claims that the court improperly ‘‘fail[ed] to consider and conclude that the plaintiff waived [the] time [is] of the essence require- ment . . . .’’ That claim, however, is predicated on the defendant’s con- tention that certain acts by the plaintiff constituted ‘‘a material breach which excused [the defendant’s] performance [under the stipulation] as a matter of law, at least as far as tim…
discussed Cited "see" Cathedral Green, Inc. v. Hughes (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bernet v. Bernet , 56 Conn.App. 661 , 664, 745 A.2d 827 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Gianetti v. Rutkin (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ancona v. Manafort Bros., Inc., 56 Conn. App. 701, 715 , 746 A.2d 184 (noting absence of “any authority that would support [the] claim that the filing of a civil action with probable cause could form the basis of a violation of CUTPA”), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLP (2×)
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ancona v. Manafort Bros., Inc., 56 Conn. App. 701, 707 , 746 A.2d 184 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000). 13 The law firm brought the underlying action contending that the financial disclosure statements were inaccurate and incomplete in violation of § 17b-529.
discussed Cited "see" Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLP (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ancona v. Manafort Bros., Inc., 56 Conn. App. 701, 708 , 746 A.2d 184 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Verspyck v. Franco (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ancona v. Manafort Bros., Inc., 56 Conn. App. 701, 709 , 746 A.2d 184 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ancona, v. Manafort Bros., Inc., 56 Conn. App. 701, 707 , 746 A.2d 184 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 954 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. John L.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (1) (A); see also State v. Markeveys, 56 Conn. App. 716, 719 , 745 A.2d 212 (words of party opponent generally admissible against him or her), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 953 , 749 A.2d 1203 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Povroznik v. Rivercliff Fuel, Inc., No. Cv01 07 37 64 (Oct. 22, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court held that in order to state such a claim, the plaintiff has the burden of pleading both that "the defendant should have realized that its conduct involved an unreasonable risk of causing emotional distress and that distress, if it were caused, might result in illness or bodily harm." Id.; see also Ancona v. Manafort Bros., Inc., 56 Conn. App. 701 , 713 , 746 A.2d 184 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 954 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Early v. Derby Neck Library, No. Cv00-0072405s (Sep. 27, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court held, however, that in order to state such a claim, the plaintiff has the burden of pleading both that "the defendant should have realized that its conduct involved an unreasonable risk of causing emotional distress and that distress, if it were caused, might result in illness or bodily harm." (Emphasis added.) Id.; see also Ancona v. Manafort Bros., Inc ., 56 Conn. App. 701 , 713 , 746 A.2d 184 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 954 , 749 A.2d 1202 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BENJAMIN ANCONA
v.
MANAFORT BROTHERS, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 13, 2000.
749 A.2d 1202
Tara K. Lyons and Vincent F. Sabatini, in support of the petition., Kenneth R. Slater, Jr., in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 701 (AC 18372), is denied.