green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Buddhu
Regarding the last of those three claims, we note that it is not within our province to overrule the decisions of our Supreme Court; see State v. Robinson, 56 Conn. App. 794, 801 , 746 A.2d 210 , cert, denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 938 (2000); and that the state indicated in its principal brief to this court that it raised that claim to preserve it for possible review by our Supreme Court.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Relliford
See State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 838-41 , 746 A.2d 795 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Samuels
Every reasonable presumption should be made in favor of the correctness of the court’s ruling in determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion.’ ”); see also State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 840 , 746 A.2d 795 (“ ‘trial court, which has a firsthand impression of the jury, is in the best position to evaluate the critical question of whether the juror’s or jurors’ exposure has prejudiced a defendant’ ”), cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lacks
Id., 474 ; State v. Taylor, supra, 239 Conn. 504 -505; see also State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 843 , 746 A.2d 795 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
THOM N. ASHBY
v.
THOM N. ASHBY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 28, 2000.
Thom N. Ashby, pro se, in support of the petition., Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 908 (AC 19506), is denied.