State v. Mitchell, 754 A.2d 162 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Mitchell, 754 A.2d 162 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Thompson (connappct, 2010-10-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Thompson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mitchell, 56 Conn. App. 561, 567-68 , 744 A.2d 927 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 162 (2000).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jevarjian
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mitchell, 56 Conn. App. 561, 567-68 , 744 A.2d 927 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 162 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Monette v. Monette (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 470 , 743 A.2d 1135 , cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
cited Cited "see" Medvey v. Medvey
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 470 , 743 A.2d 1135 , cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keusch v. Keusch
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Amodio v. Amodio , 56 Conn. App. 459 , 472, 743 A.2d 1135 ("[t]he plain language of § 46b-86 [a] ... makes clear that if a decree precludes modification ... no modification may be had"), cert. granted, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000), with Guille v. Guille , 196 Conn. 260 , 265, 492 A.2d 175 (1985) (observing that minor children of marriage have right to support, which parents cannot contractually limit, and concluding that "neither the general language of ... § 46b-86 [a] ... nor the decree's broadly phrased nonmodifiability provision, was e…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Houghtaling
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Whether a defendant’s actual expectation of privacy . . . is one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable involves a fact- specific inquiry into all the relevant circumstances.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hill, 237 Conn. 81, 92 , 675 A.2d 866 (1996). ‘‘Furthermore, [t]he defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts necessary to demonstrate a basis for standing . . . and the trial court’s finding [on the question of standing] will not be overturned unless it is legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or involves…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Although . . . judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively . . . this general rule applies to cases that are pending and not to cases that have resulted in final judgments.” 5 (Citation omitted.) Marone v. Waterbury, 244 Conn. 1 , 10—11, 707 A.2d 725 (1998); see also Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 472 , 743 A.2d 1135 , (“[d]ecisional law can apply retroactively only to cases that are pending”), cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kendrick
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 291 (1995); see also State v. Mitchell, 56 Conn. App. 561, 564 , 744 A.2d 927 (“[ajbsent exigent circumstances or consent, the police, even armed with an arrest warrant, cannot search for a subject in the home of a third party, without first obtaining a search warrant directing entry”), cert. denied, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 162 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morrison v. Sentence Review Division of the Superior Court
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Although it is true that judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively; State v. Ryerson, 201 Conn. 333, 339 , 514 A.2d 337 (1986); this general rule applies to cases that are pending and not to cases that have resulted in final judgments.” (Emphasis added.) Marone v. Waterbury, 244 Conn. 1, 10-11 , 707 A.2d 725 (1998); see also Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 472 , 743 A.2d 1135 , cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JOHN MITCHELL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 18, 2000.
754 A.2d 162
William S. Palmieri, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 561 (AC 18366), is denied.