green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. Commissioner of Correction
See Morrison v. Commissioner of Correction, 57 Conn. App. 145, 147 , 747 A.2d 1058 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 920 , 755 A.2d 215 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Nardini, 187 Conn. 109 , 127–28, 445 A.2d 304 (1982) (if sentence modified by review division ‘‘is illegal in any respect the appropriate remedy for correcting such illegality is by appeal to this court . . . by writ of error . . . or by writ of habeas corpus’’ (citations omitted; emphasis added)); see also Morrison v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 57 Conn. App. 145 , 146–49, 747 A.2d 1058 (clarify- ing that, whereas appropriate procedural vehicle for challenging legality of any reviewable ruling by review division itself is writ of error, appropriate procedural vehicl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RALPH J. BIRCH
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 19, 2000.
David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition., Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The petitioner Ralph J. Birch’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 383 (AC 18671), is denied.