green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Gordon v. Gordon
See Giulietti v. Giulietti , 65 Conn.App. 813 , 833-35, 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLC
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813 , 835–36, 784 A.2d 905 (continuing course of conduct tolled statute of limitations when defendant attorney prepared deeds and escrow agreements subject to conditions not speci- fied by his father/client, and parties had continuing rela- tionship wherein attorney continued to serve as general counsel for his family’s business without taking ‘‘steps necessary to effectuate his father’s wishes regarding the property distribution,’’ which was omission that ‘‘related directly back to [the] attorney[’s] . . . earlier wrongs’’), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLC
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813 , 835–36, 784 A.2d 905 (defendant attorney, who provided regular legal services to his elderly father over period of years, had continuing duty to effectuate father’s directives regarding transfers of his property to plaintiff and his siblings), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001). 30 In the medical malpractice context, we have held that a physician’s duty to warn a patient of a known dangerous medical condition or risk may extend beyond the close of treatment, even when there no longer is a physician-patient relati…
cited
Cited "see"
Young v. Young
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 852-53 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Traystman, Coric & Keramidas v. Daigle
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 878 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Premier Capital, Inc. v. Grossman
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 833 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
National Loan Investors, L.P. v. World Properties, LLC
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 833 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weinstein v. Weinstein
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 878 , 784 A.2d 905 (“ ‘trial court is free to accept or reject, in whole or in part, the evidence presented by any witness, having the opportunity to observe the witnesses and gauge their credibility’ ”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Williams
See Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 833 , 784 A.2d 905 (“question of whether a party’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001); Stingone v. Elephant’s Trunk Flea Market, 53 Conn. App. 725, 729 , 732 A.2d 200 (1999) (“ ‘[sjummary judgment may be granted where the claim is barred by the statute of limitations’ ”); Baldwin v. Jablecki, 52 Conn. App. 379, 381 , 726 A.2d 1164 (1999) (“ ‘interpretation of pleadings is always a question of law f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ostapowicz v. Wisniewski
See, e.g., Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 846 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 788 A.2d 95 (2001), and cert. denied, 258 Conn. 947 , 788 A.2d 95 (2001), and cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wasko v. Farley
See, e.g., Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 840-41 , 784 A.2d 905 (“[t]he parties may not merely cite a legal principle without analyzing the relationship between the facts of the case and the law cited” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001). 19 The plaintiffs brief, without offering any legal analysis of its own, urges us to adopt in full the reasoning of the Superior Court in Bates v. Rebimbas, Superior Court, judicial district of Waterbury, Docket No. CV-06-65000640-S, (September 13,2006) ( 42 Conn. L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Listenes v. Listenes
The [fact finder] can . . . decide what—all, none, or some—of a witness’ testimony to accept or reject.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Richards v. Richards, 82 Conn. App. 372, 376 , 844 A.2d 889 (2004); see also Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 878 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Total Aircraft, LLC v. Nascimento
Our Supreme Court has stated that “[a]ny relief can be granted under the general prayer which is consistent with the case stated in the complaint and is supported by the proof provided the defendant will not be surprised or prejudiced thereby.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cottrell v. Cottrell, *581 106 Conn. 411, 420 , 138 A. 458 (1927); see also Giulietti v. Giulietti, 65 Conn. App. 813, 860 , 784 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 946 , 947, 788 A.2d 95 , 96, 97 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHARLES D. GIANETTI
v.
NORWALK HOSPITAL
v.
NORWALK HOSPITAL
SC 16640X01.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 4, 2001.
William F. Gallagher and Hugh D. Hughes, in support of the petition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 218 (AC 20197), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, on the remand, the plaintiff was entitled to prove damages for only one year?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.