Coady v. Martin, 789 A.2d 993 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Coady v. Martin, 789 A.2d 993 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Duplissie v. Devino (connappct, 2006-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Duplissie v. Devino (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coady v. Martin, 65 Conn. App. 758, 766 , 784 A.2d 897 (2001) (“absence of aprovision delineating the percentage of ownership of all of the parties in the company rendered the agreement fatally incomplete”), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 905 , 789 A.2d 993 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Columbo v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., Inc., 67 Conn. App. 62, 63-65 , 787 A.2d 5 (2001) (evidence that plaintiff fell on dirty milk insufficient basis for inference to be drawn that milk was on floor for sufficient period of time to establish actual or constructive notice), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 912 , 789 A.2d 993 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Perricone v. Perricone (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The terms of a contract are reasonably certain if they provide a basis for determining the existence of a breach and for giving an appropriate remedy.” 1 Restatement (Second), supra, § 33 (2), p. 92; see also Coady v. Martin, 65 Conn. App. 758, 767 , 784 A.2d 897 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 905 , 789 A.2d 993 (2002). “[T]he degree of certainty required may be affected by the dispute which arises and by the remedy sought.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JAMES M. COADY
v.
GREGORY MARTIN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 3, 2002.
789 A.2d 993
Charles D. Houlihan, Jr., in support of the petition., Richard P. Weinstein and Nathan A. Schatz, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 758 (AC 20738), is denied.

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.