Kronberg v. Peacock, 793 A.2d 1089 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Kronberg v. Peacock, 793 A.2d 1089 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ross v. Ross (connappct, 2020-10-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ross v. Ross
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
In unbundling an unallocated order, the court ‘‘will also need to ascertain the intent of the parties.’’ Malpeso v. Malpeso, supra, 165 Conn. 171 ; see also Brent v. Lebowitz, 67 Conn. App. 527, 532 , 787 A.2d 621 (court must determine what was intended to be child support within unallocated alimony and child support order to ensure agreement did not run afoul of guidelines), cert. granted on other grounds, 260 Conn. 902 , 793 A.2d 1087 (2002) (appeal withdrawn April 25, 2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALPHONSE KRONBERG
v.
TRINI PEACOCK
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2002.
793 A.2d 1089
David T. Grudberg, in support of the petition., Carla Ottaviano, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 668 (AC 21813), is denied.

David T. Grudberg, in support of the petition. Carla Ottaviano, in opposition. Decided March 14, 2002