Cupe v. Comm'r of Corr., 795 A.2d 544 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Cupe v. Comm'r of Corr., 795 A.2d 544 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of America (connsuperct, 2004-01-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of America
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gardner v. Pilato, 68 Conn. App. 448 , 791 A.2d 707 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 908 , 795 A.2d 544 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
In light of that guidance, this court subsequently held that ‘‘Golding review is not available for unpreserved claims of [constitutional] error raised for the first time in a habeas appeal.’’ Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of Correction, 83 Conn. App. 199, 202 , 848 A.2d 1229 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 914 , 853 A.2d 527 (2004); see also Cupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 262 , 271 n.12, 791 A.2d 614 (‘‘Golding does not grant . . . authority for collateral review and is . . . inappli- cable to habeas proceedings’’), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 908 , 795 A.2d 544 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kitchens (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Safford v. Warden, 223 Conn. 180 , 190 n. 12, 612 A.2d 1161 (1992); see also Cupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 262 , 271 n.12, 791 A.2d 614 (“Golding does not grant . . . authority for collateral review and is . . . inapplicable to habeas proceedings”), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 908 , 795 A.2d 544 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shelton v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Safford v. Warden, 223 Conn. 180 , 190 n.12, 612 A.2d 1161 (1992); see also Cupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 262 , 271 n.12, 791 A.2d 614 (‘Golding does not grant . . . authority for collateral review and is . . . inapplicable to habeas proceedings’), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 908 , 795 A.2d 544 (2002).” Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of *873 Correction, 83 Conn. App. 199, 202 , 848 A.2d 1229 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 914 , 853 A.2d 527 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Safford v. Warden, 223 Conn. 180 , 190 n.12, 612 A.2d 1161 (1992); see also Cupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 262 , 271 n.12, 791 A.2d 614 (“Golding does not grant . . . authority for collateral review and is . . . inapplicable to habeas proceedings”), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 908 , 795 A.2d 544 (2002).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Tyson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Cupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 262, 267 , 791 A.2d 614 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 908 , 795 A.2d 544 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DWIGHT CUPE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 28, 2002.
795 A.2d 544
Sebastian O. DeSantis, special public defender, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The petitioner Dwight Cupe’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 262 (AC 21391), is denied.