Bd. of Educ. v. Town & Borough of Naugatuck, 806 A.2d 1053 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Bd. of Educ. v. Town & Borough of Naugatuck, 806 A.2d 1053 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McKeever v. Fiore (connappct, 2003-08-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McKeever v. Fiore
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thompson v. Orcutt, 70 Conn. App. 427, 435 , 800 A.2d 530 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 917 , 806 A.2d 1058 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Hart v. Carruthers
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thompson v. Orcutt, 70 Conn. App. 427, 441 , 800 A.2d 530 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 917 , 806 A.2d 1058 (2002); Maloney v. PCRE, LLC, 68 Conn. App. 727, 743-44 , 793 A.2d 1118 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Fenner v. Hartford Courant Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thompson v. Orcutt, 70 Conn. App. 427, 441 , 800 A.2d 530 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 917 , 806 A.2d 1058 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN AND BOROUGH OF NAUGATUCK
v.
TOWN AND BOROUGH OF NAUGATUCK
SC 16825.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 5, 2002.
806 A.2d 1053
N. Warren Hess III, in support of the petition., Mark J. Sommaruga, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition by the defendant town and borough of Naugatuck for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 358 (AC 18902), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the budget amendment of the defendant town and borough of Naugatuck was invalid?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.