green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ducharme v. Gaines, No. Cv 02-00816516 (Dec. 19, 2002)
Recently, in DaCruz v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co. , 69 Conn. App. 507 cert. granted 261 Conn. 938 1 (2002), the Appellate Court held that State Farm was bound by a finding of negligence entered by default in the underlying case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Scroggin
(2×)
To summarize, making every reasonable presumption in favor of the trial court’s decision, as we are required to do; see Webster Bank v. Zak, 71 Conn. App. 550 , 556–57, 802 A.2d 916 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 938 , 808 A.2d 1135 (2002); the court did not err in deciding that the amended complaint did not extinguish the default, and it was not plain error, but instead was within the court’s discretion, for it to decline to consider the defen- dant’s answer to the first count of the amended com- plaint because the defendant had not filed a motion to open and set aside the default, which d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cunniffe v. Cunniffe
See Marshall v. Marshall, 71 Conn. App. 565, 575 , 803 A.2d 919 (‘‘matters of judicial economy, docket management and control of court- room proceedings are particularly within the province of a trial court’’), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002). ‘‘Because a matter by definition cannot be simultaneously continued and concluded, it is dubious that a continuance would constitute a final judgment.’’ Harvey v. Wilcox, 67 Conn. App. 1, 6 , 786 A.2d 533 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Violano v. Fernandez
(2×)
See Segreto v. Bristol, 71 Conn.App. 844, 857 , 804 A.2d 928 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002); Colon v. Board of Education, 60 Conn.App. 178, 181-83 , 758 A.2d 900 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 908 , 763 A.2d 1034 2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. Bryant-Mitchell
As we have stated, the Superior Court cannot ‘‘enlarge the scope of the appeal.’’ Silverstein’s Appeal from Probate, supra, 13 Conn. App. 54 ; see also Marshall v. Marshall, 71 Conn. App. 565, 571 , 803 A.2d 919 (con- cluding that Superior Court was without jurisdiction to consider ‘‘issue of whether counsel committed miscon- duct,’’ as ‘‘the plaintiff appealed from the admission of the will to probate and the approval of the defendant Page 16 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0 18 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 Moore v. Bryant-Mitchell as executrix’’ and, thus, issue of whether counsel …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Grady v. Town of Somers
See, e.g., Segreto v. Bristol, 71 Conn. App. 844, 856-58 , 804 A.2d 928 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Violano v. Fernandez
Specifically, the court stated that “what constitutes a reasonable, proper *323 or adequate inspection involves the exercise of judgment.” Id.; see also Segreto v. Bristol, 71 Conn. App. 844, 857-58 , 804 A.2d 928 (concluding that trial court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on ground of governmental immunity because plaintiffs allegation that defendant negligently designed and maintained stairway involved exercise of discretion and judgment), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002); but see Tango v. New Haven, 173 Conn. 203 , 205-206 and n.1, 377 A.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAVID J. DACRUZ
v.
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
v.
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
SC 16847.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2002.
James N. Tallberg and Barbara A. Frederick, in support of the petition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 507 (AC 20884), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff may recover against the defendant pursuant to General Statutes § 38a-321 as a matter of law?”