green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flores
Although the defendant is correct that, to be convicted of robbery in the first degree under § 53a-134 (a) (3), the state must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he actually used or threatened to use a dangerous instrument; see State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585 , 591–92, 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002); the defendant was only charged with and convicted of attempt to commit robbery. ‘‘Under General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2), [a] person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if, acting with the kind of mental state required for commission of…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cunniffe v. Cunniffe
See Marshall v. Marshall, 71 Conn. App. 565, 575 , 803 A.2d 919 (‘‘matters of judicial economy, docket management and control of court- room proceedings are particularly within the province of a trial court’’), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002). ‘‘Because a matter by definition cannot be simultaneously continued and concluded, it is dubious that a continuance would constitute a final judgment.’’ Harvey v. Wilcox, 67 Conn. App. 1, 6 , 786 A.2d 533 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bonner
The trial court’s conclusions must stand unless they are legally and logically inconsistent with the facts.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Cote, 101 Conn. App. 527, 532 , 922 A.2d 322 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 901 , 931 A.2d 266 (2007); accord State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 597 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002); State v. Lacks, 58 Conn. App. 412, 417 , 755 A.2d 254 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 919 , 759 A.2d 1026 (2000); State v. Rodriguez, 47 Conn. App. 91, 98 , 702 A.2d 906 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 960 , 705 A.2d 552 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
Because on the facts of this case, the jury necessarily would have found the defendants guilty of the lesser charge of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136, had it considered that charge; see State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 592 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1162 , 125 S. Ct. 1327 , 161 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Nicholson v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Violano v. Fernandez
(2×)
See Segreto v. Bristol, 71 Conn.App. 844, 857 , 804 A.2d 928 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002); Colon v. Board of Education, 60 Conn.App. 178, 181-83 , 758 A.2d 900 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 908 , 763 A.2d 1034 2000).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Carneiro
See State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 595 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. Bryant-Mitchell
As we have stated, the Superior Court cannot ‘‘enlarge the scope of the appeal.’’ Silverstein’s Appeal from Probate, supra, 13 Conn. App. 54 ; see also Marshall v. Marshall, 71 Conn. App. 565, 571 , 803 A.2d 919 (con- cluding that Superior Court was without jurisdiction to consider ‘‘issue of whether counsel committed miscon- duct,’’ as ‘‘the plaintiff appealed from the admission of the will to probate and the approval of the defendant Page 16 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0 18 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 Moore v. Bryant-Mitchell as executrix’’ and, thus, issue of whether counsel …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Grady v. Town of Somers
See, e.g., Segreto v. Bristol, 71 Conn. App. 844, 856-58 , 804 A.2d 928 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 596 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002), on appeal after remand, 83 Conn. App. 439 , 850 A.2d 1089 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1162 , 125 S. Ct. 1327 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Violano v. Fernandez
Specifically, the court stated that “what constitutes a reasonable, proper *323 or adequate inspection involves the exercise of judgment.” Id.; see also Segreto v. Bristol, 71 Conn. App. 844, 857-58 , 804 A.2d 928 (concluding that trial court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on ground of governmental immunity because plaintiffs allegation that defendant negligently designed and maintained stairway involved exercise of discretion and judgment), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1132 (2002); but see Tango v. New Haven, 173 Conn. 203 , 205-206 and n.1, 377 A.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALLAN NICHOLSON
v.
ALLAN NICHOLSON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2002.
John A. East III, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Daniel J. Kriseh and Michael S. Taylor, special public defenders, in opposition.
Published
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 71 Conn. App. 585 (AC 22834), is denied.
Daniel J. Kriseh and Michael S. Taylor, special public defenders, in opposition. Decided September 27, 2002