green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Martowska v. White
Brennan v. Brennan, 85 Conn. App. 172, 177-78 , 857 A.2d 927 (order temporarily modifying custody final judgment), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 944 , 861 A.2d 1177 (2004); but see Strobel v. Strobel, 73 Conn. App. 428, 434-37 , 808 A.3d 698 (“temporary” order without hearing akin to emergency order and not final judgment), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 928 , 814 A.2d 383 (2002); Practice Book § 63-1 (appeal must be filed within twenty days of date notice of decision given).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colonial Investors, LLC v. Furbush
See Strobel v. Strobel , 73 Conn.App. 488 , 490, 808 A.2d 1138 ("[w]e consistently have held that [a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 928 , 814 A.2d 383 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Linder
See Strobel v. Strobel , 73 Conn.App. 488 , 490, 808 A.2d 1138 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 928 , 814 A.2d 383 (2002) ("[w]e consistently have held that [a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly" [internal quotation marks omitted] ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KEVIN L. STROBEL
v.
ROSE LI-HWA STROBEL
v.
ROSE LI-HWA STROBEL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 30, 2002.
Rose Li-Hwa Strobel, pro se, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.