State v. Palmer, 833 A.2d 465 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Palmer, 833 A.2d 465 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (38 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Purvis (connappct, 2024-08-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Purvis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659 , 676–77, 828 A.2d 659 (acknowledging that ‘‘[t]he quantity of drugs is not . . . the sole dispositive factor’’ because intent can be inferred through circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 248, 253, 61 A.3d 1084 (2013). ‘‘Moreover, [a] large num- ber of packets in the defendant’s possession is [a] fact from which the inference of possession with intent to sell can be drawn.’’ State v. Bowens, 24 Conn. App. 642, 649 , 591 A.2…
discussed Cited "see" Bharrat v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn.App. 659 , 666-67, 828 A.2d 659 (if argument in support of claim is different on appeal, argument is not preserved and only reviewable if argument meets requirements of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 [ (1989) ] ), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 248, 253, 61 A.3d 1084 (2013).
discussed Cited "see" State v. VanDeusen
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Wright, 77 Conn. App. 80, 93 , 822 A.2d 940 (fleeing with codefen- dant who remained in possession of gun after shooting is indicative of intent to commit murder), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 466 (2003); State v. Patterson, 229 Conn. 328, 334 , 641 A.2d 123 (1994) (concealment of weapon after crime establishes consciousness of guilt); see also State v. Booth, supra, 250 Conn. 657 (‘‘the jury reasonably could have concluded that [the defendant] lied to the police to cover up his part in the crime’’).
discussed Cited "see" Savoie v. Daoud
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659, 677-81 , 829 A.2d 569 (single unchallenged, affirmative statement that subject apartment complex was public housing project sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of public housing project where defendant failed to object to testimony, cross-examine witness on issue or request offer of proof as to witness’ qualifications to testify to such), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , *38 833 A.2d 465 (2003); In re Jose M., 30 Conn. App. 381, 390 , 620 A.2d 804 (testimony became part of eviden…
cited Cited "see" State v. Pagan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659, 678-81 , 828 A.2d 659 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DAVID L. PALMER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 25, 2003.
833 A.2d 465
Michael A. D’Onofrio, special public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 418 (AC 22713), is denied.

Michael A. D’Onofrio, special public defender, in support of the petition. Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 25, 2003