green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Whelan v. Brestelli
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436 , 451–54, 835 A.2d 491 (2003) (prejudgment remedy may be sought and ordered postjudgment to protect plaintiff’s interest in judgment during pen- dency of appeal), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
GMAT Legal Title Trust 2014-1, U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. Catale
See Gagne v. Vac- caro, 80 Conn. App. 436 , 451–54, 835 A.2d 491 (2003) (prejudgment remedy may be sought and ordered post- judgment to protect plaintiff’s interest in judgment while awaiting outcome of appeal), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bertrand
See Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 666-67 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas T. Lonardo, P.C. v. Dichello
During oral argument to this court, however, the defendant conceded both that the plaintiff continued to work on the file after April 1, 2004, because he had greater familiarity with the transaction and that the defendant did not object to the plaintiffs continuing work, even after receiving this invoice. 3 It bears emphasis, however, that the portion of Cole cited by the court related to the justification for remunerating attorney’s fees under a claim of quantum meruit; the cited passage did not involve a breach of contract claim. 4 Although rule 1.5 (b) does not provide an independent caus…
cited
Cited "see"
Spencer v. Star Steel Structures, Inc.
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 451-52 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell v. Russell
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 255 Conn. 390, 401 , 766 A.2d 416 (2001) (“lack of a remedy under the contract is a precondition for recovery based upon unjust enrichment”), on appeal after remand, 80 Conn. App. 436 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004); 26 S. Williston, Contracts (4th Ed. 2003) § 68:5, p. 58 (“[w]here the plaintiff has no alternative right on an enforceable contract, the basis of the plaintiffs recovery is the unjust enrichment of the defendant”); 66 Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Detar v. Coast Venture XXVX, Inc.
(2×)
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 449 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Tadros v. Tripodi
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 451-54 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert, denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 665-66 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tutson
See Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 665-66 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004) (interpretation of rule of practice engenders plenary review).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welsh v. Martinez
Martinez, Jr., for purposes of clarity, we refer to him as the defendant in this opinion. 2 For a more detailed account of the conduct that gave rise to this litigation, see Welsh v. Martinez, supra, 157 Conn. App. 225–34. 3 The defendant did not challenge the propriety of that supplemental award on appeal. 4 On April 23, 2013, the trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion for post- judgment interest and ordered that ‘‘interest at the rate of 3.5 percent per annum is awarded as of December 25, 2012.’’ 5 We note that ‘‘[d]espite the apparent contradiction in terms, a prejudg- m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nash
His intent is transposed from the person to whom it was directed to the person actually killed [or injured].’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Higgins, 265 Conn. 35, 51 , 826 A.2d 1126 (2003); see also State v. Hinton, supra 227 Conn. 306 n.8 . 13 In accordance with this principle, the Appellate Court has upheld convic- tions involving allegedly inconsistent mental states when the jury reasonably could have found that a defendant’s single course of conduct actually ‘‘consti- tuted different crimes that occurred on an escalating continuum.’’ (Internal quotation marks …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Rodrigues
Because mootness implicates subject matter jurisdiction, it presents a question of law over which our review is plenary. ” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, 291 Conn. 502, 506-507 , 970 A.2d 578 (2009); see also Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 664 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McFarlane
See State v. Mooney, supra, 61 Conn. App. 722 ; see also State v. Bjorklund, 79 Conn. App. 535, 567-68, 830 A.2d 1141 (2003) (reasonable for jury to conclude that defendant’s kicking victim in torso in attempt to steal wallet exhibited intent to cause serious injury while subsequent kicking of head after victim resisted was reckless), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 882 (2004); State v. Flynn, 14 Conn. App. 10, 27 , 539 A.2d 1005 (single act of throwing beer bottle at police officers in crowded bar simultaneously demonstrated intent to assault peace officer and reckless endangerment t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Martin
See, e.g., State v. Hightower, 81 Conn. App. 377, 381-82 , 840 A.2d 32 (plain error not established where defendant did not assert affirmative defense and “there was no evidence presented to support such a defense had it been asserted”), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 918 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004). 5 To the contrary, there was evidence presented through the testimony of the state’s witness, Harris, to establish that the defendant had reasonable ground to believe that Carlton Martin was armed with a gun moments prior to entering Gallo’s.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
It is primarily designed to forestall any dissipation of assets by the defendant and to bring [those assets] into the custody of the law to be held as security for the satisfaction of such judgment as the plaintiff may recover . . . .” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Morris v. Cee Dee, LLC, 90 Conn. App. 403, 412 , 877 A.2d 899 , cert. granted on other grounds, 275 Conn. 929 , 883 A.2d 1245 (2005) (appeal withdrawn March 13, 2006); see also Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 452 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A. 2d 881 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
OLD KENT MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
v.
DORIS FORD
v.
DORIS FORD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 30, 2004.
Raymond J. Devlin, Jr., in support of the petition., Matthew B. Woods, in opposition.
Palmer.
Published
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 24300) is dismissed.
PALMER, J.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.