State v. Arrington, 846 A.2d 881 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Arrington, 846 A.2d 881 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCarter & English, LLP v. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. (ctd, 2025-11-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" McCarter & English, LLP v. Jarrow Formulas, Inc.
D. Conn. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ceci Bros., Inc. v. Five Twenty-One Corp., 81 Conn. App. 419 , 433 cert. denied, 268 Conn. 922 (2004) (plaintiff “was under no requirement to refile” the offer of compromise after amending complaint to assert new causes of action for breach of contract and quantum meruit).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lawson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, the doctrine serves as a dividing line between two closely related factual situations: (1) where two or more acts or forces, one of which was set in motion by the defendant, combine to cause the *242 victim’s injuries, in which case the doctrine will not relieve the defendant of criminal responsibility; and (2) where an act or force intervenes in such a way as to relieve a defendant, whose conduct contributed in fact to the victim’s injuries, from responsibility, in which case the doctrine will apply.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 124-25 ; see State v. Arrington, 81 Con…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Paniccia v. Success Village Apartments, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Whether interest may be awarded depends on whether the money involved is payable . . . and whether the detention of the money is or is not wrongful under the circum- stances.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Sosin v. Sosin, 300 Conn. 205, 229 , 14 A.3d 307 (2011); see also Ceci Bros., Inc. v. Five Twenty-One Corp., 81 Conn. App. 419, 427 , 840 A.2d 578 (‘‘Connecticut case law establishes that prejudgment interest is to be awarded if, in the discretion of the trier of fact, equitable consid- erations deem that it is warranted’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
D. Conn. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
DiLieto, 297 Conn. at 153 , 998 A.2d 730 (2010); see also Ceci Bros., Inc. v. Five Twenty-One Corp., 81 Conn.App. 419 , 840 A.2d 578 (App.Ct.), cert denied, 268 Conn. 922 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004) (holding that section 52-192a provides for mandatory imposition of interest at a set rate and affords no allowance for the discretion of the court); Cardenas v. Mixcus, 264 Conn. 314, 321 , 823 A.2d 321 (2003) (“Our courts have consistently held that prejudgment interest is to be awarded by the trial court when a valid offer of judgment is filed by the plaintiff, the offer is rejected by the defendant,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ROBERT ARRINGTON
SC 17170.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 7, 2004.
846 A.2d 881
Jeffrey R. Babbin and Kim E. Rinehart, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 518 (AC 23438), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court’s ruling precluding evidence of a prosecution witness’ intent to file a civil action against the defendant was harmless error?”