green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gonzalez
See, e.g., State v. Morocho , 93 Conn. App. 205 , 215, 888 A.2d 164 (jury reasonably may have inferred, on basis of everyday experience and evidence presented, that by entering victim's bedroom, lying on top of her while attempting to kiss and touch her all over her body, defendant took substantial step in line of conduct that would culminate in sexual intercourse), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 915 , 895 A.2d 792 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniel B.
Compare State v. Carter, 141 Conn. App. 377, 387 , 61 A.3d 1103 (2013) (focusing on what actor has done and not what remains to be done as applied to facts of case), aff’d, 317 Conn. 845 , 120 A.3d 1229 (2015), State v. Osbourne, supra, 138 Conn. App. 528 (‘‘[t]his standard focuses on what the actor has already done and not what remains to be done’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), State v. Robinson, 127 Conn. App. 1, 9 , 15 A.3d 648 (focusing on what actor has done and not what remains to be done as applied to facts of case), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 942 , 17 A.3d 477 (2011), Sta…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Robert KALMAN.
v.
Robert KALMAN.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2006.
Published
Richard E. Condon, Jr., assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn.App. 129, 887 A.2d 950 (2006), is denied.