Vejseli v. Pasha, 908 A.2d 542 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Vejseli v. Pasha, 908 A.2d 542 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (50 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thomas v. State (connappct, 2011-08-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Thomas v. State (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · confidence medium
The petitioner’s conviction was upheld on appeal to this court. 2 Id., 589.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Thomas v. State (3×)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2009 · confidence medium
Martinez and Scates testified that some dmg dealers have one person hold the dmgs and another hold the cash to minimize profit loss if they are stopped by police.” Id., 579-81.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jordan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, [t]he broad intent of § 53a-167a is to prohibit conduct that 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 13 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 15 State v. Jordan hampers the activities of the police in the performance of their duties . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 833; see State v. Silano, 96 Conn. App. 341 , 351–52, 900 A.2d 540 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 911 , 908 A.2d 542 (2006); see also In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 56 , 604 A.2d 822 (purpose of § 53a-167a is to ensure orderly compliance with police during performance of their duties …
discussed Cited "see" PMG Land Associates, L.P. v. Harbour Landing Condominium Ass'n
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rockwell v. Quintner, 96 Conn App. 221, 234 n.10, 899 A.2d 738 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 917 , 908 A.2d 538 (2006) (petition filed by attorney in opposition to motion for summary judgment not considered because attorney did not make representations under oath, nor did he attest therein that he had personal knowledge as to representations made, or that he was competent to testify as to such matters pursuant to Practice Book § 17-46); Farrell v. Farrell, 182 Conn. 34 , 37 n.2, 438 A.2d 415 (1980) (“[a]n attorney should not ordinarily become a witness on behalf of his client”).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Banks
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Thomas, 96 Conn. App. 578, 587, 901 A.2d 76 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 912 , 908 A.2d 542 (2006). 9 It is not uncommon for a fact witness also to be an “expert” witness in many contexts, and we know of no prohibition of that practice.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McFarland v. Department of Developmental Services
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
We are mindful of the general rule that “admissions, if relevant and material, made by an attorney incidental to the general authority of the attorney to represent his client in connection with and for the purpose of controlling the matter committed to him, are admissible against the client.” Collens v. New Canaan Water Co., 155 Conn. 477, 496 , 234 A.2d 825 (1967); see also Rockwell v. Quinter, 96 Conn. App. 221 , 234 n.10, 899 A.2d 738 (party may be bound by admission made in open court), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 917 , 908 A.2d 538 (2006); Levine v. Levine, 88 Conn. App. 795, 804 , 871 A.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Verdi Vejseli Et Al.
v.
Gani Pasha Et Al.
SC 17734.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2006.
908 A.2d 542
Alexandria L. Voccio, in support of the petition., Charles T. Forman, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition by the defendants Richard Fusco, Joel Skilton and the town of Watertown for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 27648) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendants’ appeal?”