Boyd v. Comm'r of Corr., 908 A.2d 543 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Boyd v. Comm'r of Corr., 908 A.2d 543 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City of Norwich v. Shelby-Posello (connappct, 2012-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" City of Norwich v. Shelby-Posello
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Juliano v. Juliano, 96 Conn. App. 381, 386 , 900 A.2d 557 (“[i]n accordance with our policy not to exalt form over substance, we have been reluctant to dismiss appeals for technical deficiencies in an appellant’s appeal form” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 921 , 908 A.2d 544 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Stevens v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Boyd v. Commissioner of Correction, 96 Conn. App. 26, 33 , 898 A.2d 838 (“[i]t is the trier’s exclusive *395 province to . . . determine the credibility of witnesses and determine whether to accept some, all or none of a witness’ testimony” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 921 , 908 A.2d 543 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Jefferson v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bridges v. Commissioner of Correction, 97 Conn. App. 119, 122 , 905 A.2d 103 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 921 , 908 A.2d 543 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gibson v. Jefferson Woods Community, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Practice Book § 61-9 (‘‘[s]hould the trial court, subsequent to the filing of a pending appeal, make a decision that the appellant desires to have reviewed, the appellant shall file an amended appeal within twenty days from the issuance of notice of the decision’’); see also Juliano v. Juliano, 96 Conn. App. 381, 386 , 900 A.2d 557 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 921 , 908 A.2d 544 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brewer
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
The rationale underlying the requirement is that a jury cannot be deemed to be unanimous if it applies inconsistent factual conclusions to alternative theories of criminal liability.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Martinez, 278 Conn. 598 , 604 n.13, 900 A.2d 485 (2006); see also State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. *359 169, 182, 903 A.2d 253 (“[a] claim bearing on the defendant’s right to a unanimous verdict implicates a fundamental constitutional right to a fair trial” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 543 (2006).…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAVID X. BOYD
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2006.
908 A.2d 543
Kent Draper, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Published

The petitioner David X. Boyd’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 26 (AC 26263), is denied.