green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schuler
(2×)
See State v. John G., 100 Conn. App. 354 , 364–65, 918 A.2d 986 , cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. R.K.C.
(2×)
See State v. John G., 100 Conn. App. 354, 364 , 918 A.2d 986 (“[f]urthermore, striking similarities between the charged and uncharged misconduct, such as the nature of the crimes and the identity of the victims, make the evidence of prior misconduct highly probative”), cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. RKC
(2×)
See State v. *118 John G., 100 Conn.App. 354, 364 , 918 A.2d 986 , ("[f]urthermore, striking similarities between the charged and uncharged misconduct, such as the nature of the crimes and the identity of the victims, make the evidence of prior misconduct highly probative"), cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Peloso
(2×)
See State v. John G., 100 Conn. App. 354 , 364 n.9, 918 A.2d 986 , cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007). 28 M testified that she had been prescribed medication at the time she began dating the defendant but that she had not taken her medication on the day of this incident.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. LW
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. John G., 100 Conn.App. 354, 364 , 918 A.2d 986 ("striking similarities between the charged and uncharged misconduct, such as the nature of the crimes and the identity of the victims, make the evidence of prior misconduct highly probative"), cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. L.W.
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. John G., 100 Conn. App. 354, 364 , 918 A.2d 986 (“striking similarities between the charged and uncharged misconduct, such as the nature of the crimes and the identity of the victims, make the evidence of prior misconduct highly probative”), cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Munoz
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. John G., 100 Conn. App. 354, 365 , 918 A.2d 986 , cert. denied, 283 Conn. 902 , 926 A.2d 670 (2007); State *98 v. Faria, supra, 47 Conn. App. 170 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
JOHN G.
v.
JOHN G.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 20, 2007.
Published
Kenneth A. Leary, New London, in support of the petition.
Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100[*671] Conn.App. 354, 918 A.2d 986 (2007), is denied.