green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re G. H.
(2×)
See In re Anthony H., 104 Conn. App. 744, 767 , 936 A.2d 638 (2007) (‘‘[o]ur appellate courts have recognized that long-term stability is critical to a child’s future health and development’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 920 , 943 A.2d 1100 (2008); In re Victoria B., supra, 79 Conn. App. 263 (trial court’s findings as to best interest of child were not clearly erroneous when much of child’s short life had been spent in custody of petitioner and child needed stability and permanency in her life).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Brian P.
(2×)
See In re Anthony H., 104 Conn. App. 744, 767 , 936 A.2d 638 (2007) (‘‘[o]ur appellate courts have recognized that long-term stability is critical to a child’s future health and development’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 920 , 943 A.2d 1100 (2008); In re Victoria B., 79 Conn. App. 245, 263 , 829 A.2d 855 (2003) (trial court’s findings as to best interest of child were not clearly erroneous when much of child’s short life had been spent in custody of commissioner and child needed stability and perma- nency in her life).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meyers v. Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly, P.C.
(2×)
See Pelletier v. Galske, 105 Conn.App. 77, 81 , 936 A.2d 689 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 921 , 943 A.2d 1100 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Mia M.
(2×)
See In re Anthony H., 104 Conn. App. 744, 762-63 , 936 A.2d 638 (2007), cert, denied, 285 Conn. 920 , 943 A.2d 1100 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Jorden R.
(2×)
We are not, therefore, presented with a case in which the court has found that the parent has failed to achieve sufficient rehabilitation despite the department’s reasonable efforts at reunification; see In re Anthony H., 104 Conn. App. 744, 750, 756 , 936 A.2d 638 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 920 , 943 A.2d 1100 (2008); but, rather, we are presented with a case in which the court has determined that the department had no obligation to attempt to reunify the respondent with her child. 6 The petitioner also alleged that the respondent was intoxicated at the time of the injury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Zarirai S.
(2×)
We have never held, however, that a foster parent may not testify during the adjudicative phase of a termination proceeding or that a trial court may not consider evidence that arises within the context of a foster placement that is relevant to one of the statutory grounds raised for termination of parental rights.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 651 ; see also In re Anthony H., 104 Conn. App. 744, 752 , 936 A.2d 638 (2007) (trial court noted that ‘‘[the child] requires a substantial amount of structure, which his prior therapeut…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re James O., Jr.
(2×)
The majority opinion does not question that her testimony was highly relevant to the grounds alleged for termination of parental rights."); see also In re Anthony H., 104 Conn.App. 744 , 752, 936 A.2d 638 (2007) (trial court noted, and Appellate Court did not question, that child needed "a substantial amount of structure, which his prior therapeutic foster homes were able to provide" within context of specific needs of child), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 920 , 943 A.2d 1100 (2008) ; In re Vincent D., 65 Conn.App. 658 , 665-66, 783 A.2d 534 (2001) (foster parent may not intervene in adjudicative ph…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re ANTHONY H. et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 14, 2008.
Published
Roseann C. Canny, in support of the petition.
Michael J. Besso, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn.App. 744, 936 A.2d 638 (2007), is denied.