green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaminski v. Commissioner
(2×)
See State v. Kaminski, 950 A.2d 1286 (Conn. 2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wade
(2×)
See State v. Wade , 106 Conn. App. 467 , 469, 490-91, 942 A.2d 1085 , cert. granted, 287 Conn. 908 , 950 A.2d 1286 (2008) (appeal withdrawn June 12, 2008).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
See State v. Thomas, 106 Conn. App. 160 , 184 n.5, 941 A.2d 394 (Bishop, J., dissenting) (recognizing split and compiling cases), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 910 , 950 A.2d 1286 (2008).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Singleton
(3×)
See State v. Wade, 106 Conn.App. 467, 491-92 , 942 A.2d 1085 (viewing jury charge as whole and finding no "meaningful distinction" between instruction that jury shall find defendant not guilty if state failed to prove "each," instead of "any," element of offense), cert. granted on other grounds, 287 Conn. 908 , 950 A.2d 1286 (2008) (appeal withdrawn June 12, 2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. LaVoie
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Wade, 106 Conn. App. 467 , 487–88, 942 A.2d 1085 (noting that, unlike impairing effects of alcohol and marijuana, impairing effects of fentanyl and Methadose are not within ‘‘common knowledge’’ of jury), cert. granted on other grounds, 287 Conn. 908 , 950 A.2d 1286 (2008) (appeal withdrawn June 12, 2008), aff’d, 297 Conn. 262 , 998 A.2d 1114 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rhoads
A determination regarding . . . subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law [over which we exercise plenary review].” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 288 Conn. 646, 651-52 , 954 A.2d 816 (2008); see also State v. Thomas, 106 Conn. App. 160, 165-66 , 941 A.2d 394 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 910 , 950 A.2d 1286 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Sidney Wade
v.
Sidney Wade
SC 18151.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 13, 2008.
Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition., Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Schaller.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn. App. 467 (AC 27397), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence of recklessness for a conviction of second degree manslaughter when it found that there was no evidence that the defendant knew or had reason to know of a risk of death from the drugs he provided?”SCHALLER, J.,
did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.