State v. Muckle, 953 A.2d 654 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Muckle, 953 A.2d 654 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Winter (connappct, 2009-10-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Winter (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
C The defendant’s final insufficiency claim relates to his conviction of disorderly conduct in violation of § 53a-182 (a), which provides in relevant part: “A person *510 is guilty of disorderly conduct when, with intent to cause inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, such person ... (2) by offensive or disorderly conduct, annoys or interferes with another person . . . .” Although we acknowledge that the finder of fact must find every element of the statute proven beyond a reasonable doubt to find the defendants guilty of the offense charged; see State…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Robert MUCKLE. State of Connecticut v. Stanley Scott. State of Connecticut v. Maryann Sprague.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 9, 2008.
953 A.2d 654
Schaller.
Published

Roger J. Frechette, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 146, 947 A.2d 972 (2008), is denied.

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.