State v. Ouellette, 961 A.2d 417 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Ouellette, 961 A.2d 417 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
70 citation events (70 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kaminski v. Semple (connappct, 2020-03-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Kaminski v. Semple
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lewis v. Slack, 110 Conn. App. 641, 643 , 955 A.2d 620 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 953 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jarmon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bradley, 39 Conn. App. 82 , 91–92, 663 A.2d 1100 (1995), cert. denied, 236 Conn. 901 , 670 A.2d 322 (1996). ‘‘[W]e presume that the legislature intends sensible results from the statutes it enacts.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pommer, 110 Conn. App. 608, 614 , 955 A.2d 637 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008).
cited Cited "see" State v. Hearl
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pommer , 110 Conn. App. 608 , 614, 955 A.2d 637 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Balloli v. New Haven Police Dept.
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pommer , 110 Conn.App. 608 , 616, 955 A.2d 637 ("[t]he rule of construction that words in a statute must be construed according to their plain and ordinary meaning [is informed by] the doctrine of [in pari] materia, under which statutes relating to the same subject matter may be looked to for guidance in reaching an understanding of the meaning of a statutory term" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008).
cited Cited "see" State v. Carolina
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pommer, 110 Conn. App. 608, 613 , 955 A.2d 637 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Young v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 109 Conn. App. 758, 765 , 953 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 950 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ouellette, 110 Conn. App. 401 ,407 n.1, 955 A.2d 582 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008).
examined Cited "see" Morant v. Commissioner of Correction (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ouellette, 110 Conn. App. 401 , 407 n.1, 955 A.2d 582 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008). 3 The petitioner did not testify at his criminal trial.
cited Cited "see" Washington v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 109 Conn. App. 758, 763 , 953 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 950 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest Warrant
Conn. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Granting the complainant the right to challenge, or appeal from, the outcome of the process, is not.’’ (Citation omitted.) Id., 642 ; see also Lewis v. Slack, 110 Conn. App. 641 , 647–48, 955 A.2d 620 (plaintiff was not classically aggrieved and therefore not entitled to appeal from Statewide Grievance Committee’s disposition of his complaint), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 953 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest Warrant
Conn. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Granting the complainant the right to challenge, or appeal from, the outcome of the process, is not.’’ (Citation omitted.) Id., 642 ; see also Lewis v. Slack, 110 Conn. App. 641 , 647–48, 955 A.2d 620 (plaintiff was not classically aggrieved and therefore not entitled to appeal from Statewide Grievance Committee’s disposition of his complaint), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 953 , 961 A.2d 417 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Knox
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Pommer, 110 Conn. App. 608, 613 , 955 A.2d 637 (review of any claim that evidence was insufficient to prove violation of criminal statute necessarily includes con- sideration of skeletal requirement of necessary ele- ments that charged statute requires to be proved), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Berrios
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Pommer , 110 Conn. App. 608 , 613, 955 A.2d 637 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hilton v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
As to the former, we have stated that ‘‘[a]n attorney’s line of questioning on examination of a witness clearly is tactical in nature. [As such, this] court will not, in hind- sight, second-guess counsel’s trial strategy.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Antonio A. v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 148 Conn. App. 832 ; see also Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 109 Conn. App. 758 , 769–70, 953 A.2d 685 (after reviewing record from both criminal and habeas proceedings, Appellate Court agreed that examination of witnesses was exer- cise of sound trial strategy that w…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Winthrop Properties, LLC
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See General Statutes § 49-4c (‘‘[a]ny mortgage entered into . . . between a private power producer . . . and an electric company . . . shall be valid to secure all obligations then existing or thereafter arising of the mortgagor to the mortgagee under an electricity purchase agreement’’); General Statutes § 49-9 (a) (‘‘[a] mortgage . . . may be released by an instrument in writing . . . setting forth that the mortgage . . . is discharged or that the indebtedness or other obligation secured thereby has been satisfied’’); General Statutes § 49-27 (‘‘[i]f any part of the de…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Perez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Pommer, 110 Conn. App. 608, 617-18 , 955 A.2d 637 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 951 , 961 A.2d 418 (2008); see also State v. Foreshaw, supra, 551 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Daniel J. Ouellette
SC 18273.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 24, 2008.
961 A.2d 417
Richard A. Reeve, special public defender, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn. App. 401 (AC 27531), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In circumstances where the prosecutor adduced evidence that the state had entered into a plea agreement with its key witness pursuant to which the state would seek a particular sentence but then, after that witness’ trial testimony, the state recommended a different, more lenient sentence for the witness, did the Appellate Court improperly refuse to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether[*952] the state’s conduct violated the defendant’s due process rights?”
Decided November 24, 2008 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18273. Richard A. Reeve, special public defender, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.