green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
See State v. Smith, 110 Conn. App. 70, 86 , 954 A.2d 202 (‘‘[r]obing garden variety claims [of an evidentiary nature] in the majestic garb of consti- tutional claims does not make such claims constitu- tional in nature’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 954 , 961 A.2d 422 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
See State v. Smith , 110 Conn.App. 70 , 86, 954 A.2d 202 ("[r]obing garden variety claims [of an evidentiary nature] in the majestic garb of constitutional claims does not make such claims constitutional in nature" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 954 , 961 A.2d 422 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Collymore
See State v. Smith , 110 Conn.App. 70 , 86, 954 A.2d 202 ("[r]obing garden variety claims [of an evidentiary nature] in the majestic garb of constitutional claims does not make such claims constitutional in nature" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 954 , 961 A.2d 422 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gibson
(2×)
See State v. Smith, 110 Conn. App. 70, 84 , 954 A.2d 202 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 954 , 961 A.2d 422 (2008); see also State v. Luster, 279 Conn. 414, 436 , 902 A.2d 636 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rojas
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 110 Conn. App. 70, 77 , 954 A.2d 202 (eyewitness identification of defendant may be reliable even if witness observed defendant for only seconds), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 954 , 961 A.2d 422 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McClelland
See State v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 406, 416-17 , 435 A.2d 986 (1980) (evidence of prior child abuse probative on issue of intent in child homicide); see also State v. Smith, 110 Conn. App. 70, 79 , 954 A.2d 202 (intent generally inferred from conduct or proven by circumstantial evidence because direct evidence of defendant’s state of mind rarely available), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 954 , 961 A.2d 422 (2008).
Allstate Insurance Company
v.
Stephen Palumbo Et Al.
v.
Stephen Palumbo Et Al.
SC 18276.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 3, 2008.
Neil Johnson, in support of the petition., Jeremiah J. O’Connor, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn. App. 731 (AC 28409), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s determination that the named defendant, who resided in an apartment and caused damage to the premises, was liable under the doctrine of equitable subrogation to the insurer of the tenant?”