State v. Coccomo, 978 A.2d 1111 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Coccomo, 978 A.2d 1111 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (53 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Burgos-Torres v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2013-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Burgos-Torres v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Burgos-Torres, 114 Conn. App. 112 , 968 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 908 , 978 A.2d 1111 (2009).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jennings
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Burgos-Torres, 114 Conn. App. 112, 117 , 968 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 908 , 978 A.2d 1111 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLC (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Concomo, 115 Conn. App. 384, 394 , 972 A.2d 757 , cert. granted on other grounds, 293 Conn. 909 , 978 A.2d 1111 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Saez, 115 Conn. App. 295, 305 , 972 A.2d 277 (defendant’s conduct in pushing store merchandise in its original packaging under theft detection device at front door of store and then exiting with it reasonably supported inference that he intended to convert prop- erty to his own use without paying for it), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 909 , 978 A.2d 1113 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Saez , 115 Conn.App. 295 , 305, 972 A.2d 277 (defendant's conduct in pushing store merchandise in its original packaging under theft detection device at front door of store and then exiting with it reasonably supported inference that he intended to convert property to his own use without paying for it), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 909 , 978 A.2d 1113 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
TRICIA LYNNE COCCOMO
SC 18443.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 2009.
978 A.2d 1111
Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Robert S. Bello and Thomas M. Cassone, in opposition.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.[*910] App. 384 (AC 28819), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18443. Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert S. Bello and Thomas M. Cassone, in opposition. Decided September 9, 2009
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a transfer of property for less than fair value as evidence of consciousness of guilt and that such admission of evidence was not harmless?”