State v. Warren, 987 A.2d 1029 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Warren, 987 A.2d 1029 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Pjura (connappct, 2020-10-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pjura
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Reynolds, 118 Conn. App. 278, 293 , 983 A.2d 874 (2009) (concluding that prosecutor’s ques- tions improperly violated trial court order because pros- ecutor’s representations to court revealed that she intended to elicit evidence court had expressly disal- lowed), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 933 , 987 A.2d 1029 (2010).
cited Cited "see" State v. Benitez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Reynolds, 118 Conn. App. 278, 291-92 , 983 A.2d 874 (2009), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 933 , 987 A.2d 1029 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Nance
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Reynolds, 118 Conn. App. 278 , 305 n.7, 983 A.2d 874 (2009) (discussing purpose of charge conference as it relates to avoiding retrials arising out of instructional errors and preventing appellants from raising claims for first time on appeal), cert, denied, 294 Conn. 933 , 987 A.2d 1029 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Dabate
Conn. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Ortiz, 280 Conn. 686, 704 , 911 A.2d 1055 (2006); see also State v. Reynolds, 118 Conn. App. 278, 292 , 983 A.2d 874 (2009) (purposeful attempt by prosecutor to include inadmissible evidence ‘‘may entitle the defen- dant to a new trial’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 933 , 987 A.2d 1029 (2010); State v. Williams, 102 Conn. App. 168, 176 , 926 A.2d 7 (‘‘evi- dentiary violations of a court order should be reviewed as prosecutorial [impropriety], not evidentiary errors’’), 9 The term ‘‘Cheshire,’’ as used in this context, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Holley
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Warren, 118 Conn.App. 456 , 464, 984 A.2d 81 (2009) (no constitutional violation where trial court's oral charge suggested written instructions should be used "only ... as a guide" because "the [ written ] copy of the charge itself correctly guided the jury by stating ... that the jury was obligated to accept the law as provided by the court" [emphasis added] ), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 933 , 987 A.2d 1029 (2010) ; United States v. Rodriguez, 651 Fed.Appx. 44 , 48 (2d Cir. 2016) ("In this case, there is no indication that the jurors were confused by the court's misreading of…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Joanne WARREN.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 28, 2010.
987 A.2d 1029
Published

Lauren Weisfeld, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn.App. 456, 984 A.2d 81 (2009), is denied.