green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Newtown
See DeCorso v. Calderaro, 118 Conn. App. 617 , 627–28, 985 A.2d 349 (2009) (‘‘[i]n adju- dicating the motions for summary judgment, the [trial] court was not required to address trespass because the operative complaint did not contain counts alleging trespass’’), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eubanks v. Commissioner of Correction
See Gibson v. Commissioner of Correction, 118 Conn.App. 863 , 872, 986 A.2d 303 ("[b]ecause this question regarding induced error versus sound trial strategy deserved encouragement to proceed further, the petitioner's petition for certification should have been granted"), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 565 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.
(2×)
See DeCorso v. Calderaro, 118 Conn. App. 617, 622 , 985 A.2d 349 (2009) (“[t]he applicable rule regarding the material facts to be considered on a motion for summary judgment is that the facts at issue are those alleged in the pleadings” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
William B. v. Commissioner of Correction
“Because the petitioner must satisfy both prongs of the Strickland test to prevail on a habeas corpus petition, this court may dispose of the petitioner’s claim if he fails to meet either prong.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Morant v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 117 Conn. App. 301 ; see Dorce v. Commissioner of Correction, 118 Conn. App. 750, 754 , 984 A.2d 1173 (“[a] reviewing court need not address both components of the inquiry if the [petitioner] makes an insufficient showing on one” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (20…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
See, e.g., DeCorso v. Calderaro, 118 Conn. App. 617, 624 , 985 A.2d 349 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010). 7 General Statutes § 31-284 (a) provides: ‘‘An employer who complies with the requirements of subsection (b) of this section shall not be liable for any action for damages on account of personal injury sustained by an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment or on account of death resulting from personal injury so sustained, but an employer shall secure compensation for his employees as provided under this chapter, except that compensation s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Commissioner of Correction
See Nieves v. Commissioner of Correction , 51 Conn. App. 615 , 621, 724 A.2d 508 ("[t]he burden that the petitioner must sustain for a favorable outcome on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a higher one than he would have to sustain had the actual merits of the same issue been raised on direct appeal"), cert. denied, 248 Conn. 905 , 731 A.2d 309 (1999) ; see also Gibson v. Commissioner of Correction , 118 Conn. App. 863 , 876 n.5, 986 A.2d 303 (noting difference in procedural posture for claims on direct appeal versus in habeas petition), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 565…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Obas
See, e.g., Gibson v. Commissioner of Correction, 118 Conn. App. 863, 864 , 986 A.2d 303 (concluding habeas court abused its discretion by denying certification to appeal, but affirming the court’s decision on the merits), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 565 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gail Decorso
v.
Jamal Calderaro Et Al.
v.
Jamal Calderaro Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 30, 2010.
Gail DeCorso, pro se, in support of the petition., Laura Pascale Zaino and Alfred J. Zullo, in opposition.
McLachlan.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 617 (AC 30353), is denied.
[*920] Gail DeCorso, pro se, in support of the petition. Laura Pascale Zaino and Alfred J. Zullo, in opposition. Decided March 30, 2010McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.