green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Conservation Commission of Fairfield v. Red 11, LLC
(2×)
See part n of this opinion. 3 See Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC, 119 Conn. App. 377, 379-84 , 987 A.2d 398 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924 , 991 A.2d 566 (2010), for a more detailed recitation of the underlying facts. 4 As a result, the commission attached extensive conditions for approval of the proposed subdivision, which subdivision the previous owner ultimately did not pursue. 5 Pursuant to the trust, the property is to remain undeveloped and available for public use.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.
(2×)
See Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC, 119 Conn. App. 377, 391 , 987 A.2d 398 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924 , 991 A.2d 566 (2010). 18 As noted previously, the plaintiff next sent Rockefeller a letter dated September 14, 2004.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Li v. Yaggi
(2×)
See Kline v. Kline , 101 Conn. App. 402 , 404 n.3, 922 A.2d 261 (declining to review defendant appellee's alternate ground for affirmance because court did not find requisite facts for her claim of equitable estoppel), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 901 , 931 A.2d 263 (2007) ; see also Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC , 119 Conn. App. 377 , 388, 987 A.2d 398 (record inadequate to review defendant's claim of municipal estoppel), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924 , 991 A.2d 566 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mangiafico v. State Board of Education
(2×)
See, e.g., Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC, 119 Conn. App. 377, 385-88 , 987 A.2d 398 (court declines to review claim of municipal estoppel when appellant failed to furnish Appellate Court with record that included trial court’s findings related to such claim), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924 , 991 A.2d 566 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Conservation Commission of the Town of Fairfield
v.
Red 11, LLC
v.
Red 11, LLC
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 7, 2010.
Anne D. Peterson, in support of the petition., NoelR. Newman, Edward V. O’Hanlan and Thomas J. Donlon, in opposition.
Rogers.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 377 (AC 30212), is denied.
[*925] Anne D. Peterson, in support of the petition. NoelR. Newman, Edward V. O’Hanlan and Thomas J. Donlon, in opposition. Decided April 7, 2010ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.