State v. Jutras, 4 A.3d 1230 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jutras, 4 A.3d 1230 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: J & E Investment Co. v. Athan (connappct, 2011-09-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" J & E Investment Co. v. Athan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Wahab, 122 Conn. App. 537 , 539 n.2, 2 A.3d 7 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" State v. KOMISARJEVSKY (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: accord · confidence high
When reviewing a trial court's exercise of the legal discretion vested in it, our review is limited to whether the trial court correctly applied the law and reasonably could have concluded as it did." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn.App. 399, 408-409 , 900 A.2d 525 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006); accord Bank of New York v. Bell, 120 Conn.App. 837, 848 , 993 A.2d 1022 , cert. dismissed, 298 Conn. 917 , 4 A.3d 1225 (2010); Preston v. O'Rourke, 74 Conn.App. 301, 317 , 811 A.2d 753 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Soracco v. Williams Scotsman, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jutras, 121 Conn. App. 756, 757 , 996 A.2d 212 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 917 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel W.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id., at 719-21 , 49 A.3d 783 (location of abuse is factor courts consider in evaluating similarity of charged and uncharged misconduct; abuse of three victims occurred either in defendant's vehicle or residence); see also State v. L.W. , 122 Conn. App. 324 , 333-34, 999 A.2d 5 (charged and uncharged conduct sufficiently similar where, "[i]n both instances, the alleged sexual misconduct occurred surreptitiously and in the defendant's residence"), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 919 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gregorio (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
I As a preliminary matter, because the defendant is appealing from the denial of a motion to dismiss, which ordinarily is not reviewable; see, e.g., State v. Jutras, 121 Conn. App. 756, 756-57 , 996 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 917 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010); we must determine whether the appeal is properly before us.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Robert Jutras
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2010.
4 A.3d 1230
Louis S. Avitabile, in support of the petition., Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Eveleigh.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 756 (AC 30813), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[*918] Louis S. Avitabile, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 22, 2010