discussed Cited "see" Giuca v. Commissioner of Correction See Hall v. Commissioner of Correction , 124 Conn.App. 778 , 780 n.1, 6 A.3d 827 (2010) (addressing merits of appeal when habeas court did not address expressly issue of procedural default as raised in return), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 928 , 12 A.3d 571 (2011).

discussed Cited "see" Davis v. Commissioner of Correction Although the judgment of the habeas court, as noted by the majority, can be affirmed on the prejudice prong of Strickland alone; see Hall v. Commissioner of Correction, 124 Conn. App. 778, 783 , 6 A.3d 827 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 928 , 12 A.3d 671 (2011); I believe that it is important to note that the petitioner also failed to prove deficient performance of counsel as required under the first prong of Strickland .

cited Cited "see" Banks v. Commissioner of Correction See Hall v. Commissioner of Correction, 124 Conn. App. 778, 783 , 6 A.3d 827 (2010) (reviewing court can find against petitioner on either prong), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 928 , 12 A.3d 571 (2011).