RMM Consulting, LLC v. Riordan, 23 A.3d 730 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
RMM Consulting, LLC v. Riordan, 23 A.3d 730 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Bonilla (connappct, 2011-09-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Bonilla
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Heck, 128 Conn. App. 633 , 641 n.2, 18 A.3d 673 , cert. denied, 301 Conn. 935 , 23 A.3d 728 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lemma v. York & Chapel, Corp.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Jenkins v. Jenkins, 186 Conn. App. 641, 650 , 200 A.3d 1193 (2018) (affirming trial court’s denial of motion to vacate arbitration award and noting that plaintiff failed to show that particular witness’ testi- mony ‘‘would have impacted the outcome of the pro- ceedings’’); see also Hartford Municipal Employees Assn. v. Hartford, 128 Conn. App. 646, 659 , 19 A.3d 193 (testimonial evidence from individual witness was not so central to plaintiff’s case that panel’s failure to con- sider it constituted misconduct), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 934 , 23 A.3d 730 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel G. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Where, as here, an accused requests an instruction on a defense such as entrapment, he may obtain such a charge by adducing evidence . . . sufficient ... for a rational juror to find that all the elements of the defense are established by a preponderance of the evidence.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Golodner, supra, 305 Conn. 351 -53; see generally State v. McNally, 173 Conn. 197, 200-202 , 377 A.2d 286 (1977); State v. Marquardt, 139 Conn. 1, 4-8 , 89 A.2d 219 (1952); see also State v. Wilder, 128 Conn. App. 750, 755 , 17 A.3d 1116 (“[i]t is well establ…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Windham
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hartford Municipal Employees Assn. v. Hartford, 128 Conn. App. 646, 653-54 , 19 A.3d 193 (construing § 52-418 [a] [3] consistent with 9 U.S.C. § 10 [a] [3]), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 934 , 23 A.3d 730 (2011); McCann v. Dept. of Environmental Protection, 288 Conn. 203, 215 , 952 A.2d 43 (2008) (same); Bridgeport v. Kasper Group, Inc., 278 Conn. 466, 475-76, 899 A.2d 523 (2006) (same); Garrity v. McCaskey, 223 Conn. 1 , 8 n.7, 612 A.2d 742 (1992) (“federal statute that provides for vacating an arbitration award, 9 U.S.C. § 10 [d], is virtually identical to General Statutes § 52-4…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RMM CONSULTING, LLC
v.
MICHAEL J. RIORDAN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 6, 2011.
23 A.3d 730
BrendonP. Levesque and Karen L. Dowd, in support of the petition., Kenneth B. Walton and Leslie P. King, in opposition.
Consideration, Harper.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 688 (AC 31529), is denied.

HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.