Blake v. United States, 16 Ct. Cl. 637 (1880). · Go Syfert
Blake v. United States, 16 Ct. Cl. 637 (1880). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gengler v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Defense & Navy (caed, 2006-11-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gengler v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Defense & Navy
E.D. Cal. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Blake v. United States, 103 U.S. 227, 233-35 , 16 Ct.Cl. 637 , 13 Otto 227 , 26 L.Ed. 462 (1880) (explaining the history of the President’s power to remove or discharge officers); Parsons v. United States, 167 U.S. 324, 334 , 32 Ct.Cl. 626 , 17 S.Ct. 880 , 42 L.Ed. 185 (1897) (discussing the President’s discretion to remove officers); Orloff, 345 U.S. at 90-91 , 73 S.Ct. 534 (confirming the President’s discretion to issue an officer’s commission).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles M. Blake
v.
United States
Dec 15, 1880.
16 Ct. Cl. 637
Haelan.
Mr. Justice Haelan

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, March 29, 1881.